So screamed the headline from Saturday’s endorsement on Barack Obama by the Anchorage Daily News. Anchorage as in Alaska. Alaska as in the state Sarah Palin governs. Sarah Palin as in the Republican vice presidential nominee.
Ouch.
Instead of merely offering my analysis, I thought I’d approach this differently. Linked above is the article, without commentary. I will now post the whole piece here, but with paragraph-by-paragraph bloviating. Enjoy.
Alaska enters its 50th-anniversary year in the glow of an improbable and highly memorable event: the nomination of Gov. Sarah Palin as the Republican vice presidential candidate. For the first time ever, an Alaskan is making a serious bid for national office, and in doing so she brings broad attention and recognition not only to herself, but also to the state she leads.
I wonder if Palin, upon reading just that paragraph, figured the rest would follow with glowing endorsements and high praid upon the Great Leader of Alaska. Read on, Sarah.
Alaska’s founders were optimistic people, but even the most farsighted might have been stretched to imagine this scenario. No matter the outcome in November, this election will mark a signal moment in the history of the 49th state. Many Alaskans are proud to see their governor, and their state, so prominent on the national stage.
Yeah, yeah. Alaska is great. It probably is. My girlfriend and I plan on visiting. But that’s an entry never to see the light of posting…
Gov. Palin’s nomination clearly alters the landscape for Alaskans as we survey this race for the presidency — but it does not overwhelm all other judgment. The election, after all is said and done, is not about Sarah Palin, and our sober view is that her running mate, Sen. John McCain, is the wrong choice for president at this critical time for our nation.
A crushing blow. It doesn’t get easier after this if your last name is McCain and you’ve been running for president since after ‘Nam.
Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, brings far more promise to the office. In a time of grave economic crisis, he displays thoughtful analysis, enlists wise counsel and operates with a cool, steady hand. The same cannot be said of Sen. McCain.
I agree with the sentiment about Obama, though am largely as ambivalent toward him as I am his GOP counterpart. Yeah, I endorsed him previously. I was probably drinking decaf that day.
Since his early acknowledgement [sic] that economic policy is not his strong suit, Sen. McCain has stumbled and fumbled badly in dealing with the accelerating crisis as it emerged. He declared that “the fundamentals of our economy are strong” at 9 a.m. one day and by 11 a.m. was describing an economy in crisis. He is both a longtime advocate of less market regulation and a supporter of the huge taxpayer-funded Wall Street bailout. His behavior in this crisis — erratic is a kind description — shows him to be ill-equipped to lead the essential effort of reining in a runaway financial system and setting an anxious nation on course to economic recovery.
If you were an adviser to McCain, wouldn’t you have tugged at his sportcoat shortly after he admitted the aforementioned and gently admonish him for said aforementioned? You, sir, are a bonehead. McCain, I mean. Not you, the reader.
Sen. Obama warned regulators and the nation 19 months ago that the subprime lending crisis was a disaster in the making. Sen. McCain backed tighter rules for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but didn’t do much to advance that legislation. Of the two candidates, Sen. Obama better understands the mortgage meltdown’s root causes and has the judgment and intelligence to shape a solution, as well as the leadership to rally the country behind it. It is easy to look at Sen. Obama and see a return to the smart, bipartisan economic policies of the last Democratic administration in Washington, which left the country with the momentum of growth and a budget surplus that President George Bush has squandered.
Yup. Obama is the smartest person ever. He can probably see through walls. After he walks on water and makes Ryan Seacrest talented.
On the most important issue of the day, Sen. Obama is a clear choice.
Nice.
Sen. McCain describes himself as a maverick, by which he seems to mean that he spent 25 years trying unsuccessfully to persuade his own party to follow his bipartisan, centrist lead. Sadly, maverick John McCain didn’t show up for the campaign. Instead we have candidate McCain, who embraces the extreme Republican orthodoxy he once resisted and cynically asks Americans to buy for another four years.
I can find no fault in this logic.
It is Sen. Obama who truly promises fundamental change in Washington. You need look no further than the guilt-by-association lies and sound-bite distortions of the degenerating McCain campaign to see how readily he embraces the divisive, fear-mongering tactics of Karl Rove. And while Sen. McCain points to the fragile success of the troop surge in stabilizing conditions in Iraq, it is also plain that he was fundamentally wrong about the more crucial early decisions. Contrary to his assurances, we were not greeted as liberators; it was not a short, easy war; and Americans — not Iraqi oil — have had to pay for it. It was Sen. Obama who more clearly saw the danger ahead.
Another entirely logical conclusion. McCain’s campaign has stooped to levels thought unimaginable before 2008. This is the same candidate so hideously maligned by his new BFF President Bush in 2000.
The unqualified endorsement of Sen. Obama by a seasoned, respected soldier and diplomat like Gen. Colin Powell, a Republican icon, should reassure all Americans that the Democratic candidate will pass muster as commander in chief.
“Republican icon?” Colin Powell? Really? Would he agree? How does one achieve iconic status? No, I’m not jealous.
On a matter of parochial interest, Sen. Obama opposes the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, but so does Sen. McCain. We think both are wrong, and hope a President Obama can be convinced to support environmentally responsible development of that resource.
Only Alaskans and presidential candidates asked by Alaskans care about this.
Gov. Palin has shown the country why she has been so successful in her young political career. Passionate, charismatic and indefatigable, she draws huge crowds and sows excitement in her wake. She has made it clear she’s a force to be reckoned with, and you can be sure politicians and political professionals across the country have taken note. Her future, in Alaska and on the national stage, seems certain to be played out in the limelight.
Is it just me, or does that smack you with more than just a whisper of sarcasm. It practically oozes from every orifice.
Yet despite her formidable gifts, few who have worked closely with the governor would argue she is truly ready to assume command of the most important, powerful nation on earth. To step in and juggle the demands of an economic meltdown, two deadly wars and a deteriorating climate crisis would stretch the governor beyond her range. Like picking Sen. McCain for president, putting her one 72-year-old heartbeat from the leadership of the free world is just too risky at this time.
Clever. Because Maverick is 72. Hilarious.
Look, this endorsement probably won’t mean very much. It will certainly play to the liberal meme of Palin’s character. But the same argument could have been made in 2000 — more effectively, I thought — when Al Gore’s home state of Tennessee voted for Bush. Of course, the libs were far too busy decrying Supreme Court intervention.
This endorsement will probably be forgotten long before Barack Obama is inaugurated the next president.
Yeah, I said it.
0 Responses to “‘Obama for president’”